Canada Pension Plan (CPP) disability

Decision Information

Decision Content



Reasons and decision

[1] The Applicant made an application for a Canada Pension Plan (CPP) disability pension that was date-stamped by the Respondent on January 22, 2014. The Respondent denied the application initially and upon reconsideration.

[2] The Applicant appealed the reconsideration decision to the General Division of the Social Security Tribunal of Canada (Tribunal). In a decision dated May 3, 2016, the General Division dismissed the appeal.

[3] The Applicant filed an application for leave to appeal with the Tribunal’s Appeal Division on June 16, 2016. On February 23, 2017, a fellow member of the Appeal Division refused the application for leave to appeal.

[4] The Applicant filed an application for judicial review of the Appeal Division’s decision with the Federal Court. On August 15, 2017, the Federal Court issued an order, on consent of both parties, allowing the application for judicial review and directing that the matter be remitted to the Appeal Division with directions that leave to appeal the General Division decision be granted.

[5] In accordance with the Federal Court order, I hereby grant the application for leave to appeal.

[6] Pursuant to s. 58(5) of the Department of Employment and Social Development Act, the application for leave to appeal hereby becomes the notice of appeal. Within 45 days after the date of this decision, the parties may (a) file submissions with the Appeal Division; or (b) file a notice with the Appeal Division stating that they have no submissions to file: Social Security Tribunal Regulations, s. 42. The Respondent may wish to make submissions regarding Dr. R. Tudhope’s report dated April 28, 2016, which was filed after the Respondent’s Addendum Submissions were received by the Tribunal on March 22, 2016.

[7] The parties may make submissions regarding the form the hearing of the appeal should take (e.g. teleconference, videoconference, in writing or in person) together with their submissions on the merits of the appeal.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.