Canada Pension Plan (CPP) disability

Decision Information

Decision Content

[TRANSLATION]

Citation : Y. G. v Minister of Employment and Social Development, 2020 SST 721

Tribunal File Number: AD-20-611

BETWEEN:

Y. G.

Applicant

and

Minister of Employment and Social Development

Respondent


SOCIAL SECURITY TRIBUNAL DECISION
Appeal Division


Leave to Appeal Decision and Appeal Decision by: Jude Samson
Date of Decision: August 24, 2020

On this page

Decision and reasons

Decision

[1] I am granting the application for leave to appeal and allowing the appeal. The Applicant is not eligible for a disability pension under the Canada Pension Plan (CPP).

Settlement agreement

[2] I am making this decision after a settlement conference held on August 24, 2020. The Applicant and a representative of the Minister attended the conference. At the conference, the parties confirmed that they agreed with the Minister’s proposal, as it was stated in its letter dated August 21, 2020.

[3] In summary, the parties agree as follows:

  1. The General Division based its decision on an erroneous finding of fact without regard for the material before it.Footnote 1
  2. Specifically, the General Division found that the Applicant had not seen a specialist before 2016. However, the Applicant was assessed in ORL, in neurology, and in cardiology before that date.
  3. Furthermore, the General Division did not consider the Applicant’s employment earnings in 2016 and 2017. These employment earnings are not mentioned or discussed in the General Division decision, even though they are very low.
  4. In this situation, it is appropriate to grant the leave to appeal application, allow the appeal, and give the decision that the General Division should have given.Footnote 2
  5. The Applicant has established that he has been disabled under the CPP since April 2016.Footnote 3
  6. The Applicant will be entitled to his disability benefits as of August 2016.Footnote 4

Conclusion

[4] Based on the information available to me, I grant the application for leave to appeal, and I allow the appeal, in accordance with the above settlement agreement.

[5] If the Applicant is satisfied with this decision, he is invited to write to the Tribunal and ask it to close his file at the General Division (GP-20-804). Given the above decision, the Applicant’s application to rescind or amend no longer seems relevant or useful.

Representatives:

Y. G., self-represented
Suzette Bernard, Representative for the Respondent

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.