Citation: DC v Minister of Employment and Social Development, 2025 SST 1297
Social Security Tribunal of Canada
General Division – Income Security Section
Decision
| Appellant: | D. C. |
| Respondent: | Minister of Employment and Social Development |
| Decision under appeal: | Minister of Employment and Social Development reconsideration decision dated February 9, 2024 (issued by Service Canada) |
| Tribunal member: | Sarah Sheaves |
| Decision date: | July 3, 2025 |
| File number: | GP-25-753 |
On this page
Decision
[1] The appeal won’t go ahead. This decision explains why.
Overview
[2] The Appellant applied for CPP disability benefits on February 10, 2023. The Minister of Employment and Social Development (Minister) refused his application. He asked it to reconsider. On February 9, 2024, the Minister reconsidered its decision and refused the application again.Footnote 1
[3] The Appellant appealed the reconsideration decision to the Social Security Tribunal (Tribunal) on May 5, 2025.
What I have to decide
[4] I have to decide whether the Appellant appealed in time.
Reasons for my decision
[5] The appeal won’t go ahead because the Appellant didn’t appeal to the Tribunal in time. Here are the reasons for my decision.
What the law says
[6] If an appellant disagrees with the Minister’s reconsideration decision, they have to appeal to the Tribunal within 90 days after the Minister told them about the decision.Footnote 2
[7] If the appellant appeals after the deadline, the Tribunal can give them more time (accept the late appeal). But in no case can the appellant appeal a reconsideration decision more than one year after the Minister told them about it.Footnote 3
The Appellant’s appeal was more than one year late
[8] I find that the Appellant’s appeal was more than one year late.
The Minister told the Appellant about its decision on February 9, 2024
[9] The Minister told the Appellant about its reconsideration decision on February 9, 2024.
[10] The Appellant received the reconsideration decision on February 14, 2024.Footnote 4
[11] The Appellant wrote the date he received the decision on the decision itself. He then sent the decision back to the Minister with his hand-written note on the first page of the decision that said ‘we ask that you reconsider your decision’. The Appellant enclosed several attachments with this submission.
[12] The Minister wrote to the Appellant on June 17, 2024.Footnote 5 It confirmed it was unable to reconsider its decision a second time, and that the Appellant must appeal to the Tribunal within 90 days of the reconsideration decision.
[13] Based on this evidence, I find that the Appellant received the Minister’s reconsideration decision on February 14, 2024.
The Appellant had to appeal by February 14, 2025
[14] The Appellant had until February 14, 2025, to appeal to the Tribunal.
[15] The Appellant appealed on May 5, 2025.Footnote 6
[16] The Tribunal doesn’t have equitable jurisdiction. This means I can’t allow the appeal to go ahead because I think it would be fair, or because I want to help the Appellant in difficult circumstances. I have to follow the law.
Conclusion
[17] The Appellant appealed more than one year after the Minister told him about its decision.
[18] This means the appeal won’t go ahead.