On this page
Decision
[1] On June 6, 2013, a panel of the board of referees (“the Board”) determined that the appeal of the Applicant from the previous determination of the Commission should be denied. In due course, the Applicant filed an application requesting leave to appeal to the Appeal Division.
[2] I have read and carefully considered the application of the Applicant. Although she re-stated her position that she has an additional 80 hours of employment not taken into account by the Commission, there was no evidence before the Board to prove that these hours were insurable or even that they existed at all. I note that only the Canada Revenue Agency can certify whether hours of employment are insurable or not when such hours are in dispute.
[3] I therefore turned my mind to the docket to determine if any ground of appeal existed on the face of the record.
[4] Having considered the appeal docket, the written submissions, and the decision of the Board, I find no ground of appeal that would have a reasonable chance of success. In my view, as evidenced by the decision, the Board conducted a proper hearing, weighed the evidence, made findings of fact, established the correct law, and applied the facts to the law.
[5] As it has no reasonable chance of success, this application for leave to appeal must be refused.