On this page
Decision
[1] On January 28, 2014, a member of the General Division determined that the appeal of the Applicant from the previous determination of the Commission should be dismissed. In due course, the Applicant filed a request for leave to appeal to the Appeal Division.
[2] Subsection 58(1) of the Department of Employment and Social Development Act states that the only grounds of appeal are that:
- (a) The General Division failed to observe a principle of natural justice or otherwise acted beyond or refused to exercise its jurisdiction;
- (b) The General Division erred in law in making its decision, whether or not the error appears on the face of the record; or
- (c) The General Division based its decision on an erroneous finding of fact that it made in a perverse or capricious manner or without regard for the material before it.
[3] The Act also states that leave to appeal is to be refused if the appeal has “no reasonable chance of success”.
[4] Among other things, the Applicant claims in his application that he was unable to connect to the teleconference and therefore only one side of the story was heard by the General Division.
[5] If shown to be true the Applicant’s arguments could result in a successful appeal. I therefore find that this application has a reasonable chance of success and that this application for leave to appeal should be granted.