Employment Insurance (EI)

Decision Information

Decision Content



Reasons and decision

Decision

[1] On consent, the appeal is allowed. The matter will be returned to the General Division for reconsideration.

Introduction

[2] Previously, a member of the General Division determined that the Appellant’s appeal should be dismissed. In due course, the Appellant filed an application for leave to appeal with the Appeal Division and leave to appeal was granted.

[3] This appeal was decided on the record.

The law

[4] According to subsection 58(1) of the Department of Employment and Social Development Act, the only grounds of appeal are that:

  1. (a) the General Division failed to observe a principle of natural justice or otherwise acted beyond or refused to exercise its jurisdiction;
  2. (b) the General Division erred in law in making its decision, whether or not the error appears on the face of the record; or
  3. (c) the General Division based its decision on an erroneous finding of fact that it made in a perverse or capricious manner or without regard for the material before it.

Analysis

[5] This appeal concerns whether or not the Appellant showed just cause for voluntarily leaving her employment.

[6] The Appellant argues, among other things, that the General Division member failed to consider that she had suffered a large change in wages and salary (from 45 hours per week to only 25) and that this change supported her claim to have shown just cause for leaving her employment.

[7] The Commission, having considered the file and the decision, now admits that the member erred as the Appellant has alleged. They agree that a new hearing must be ordered so that the Appellant’s arguments can be addressed by a General Division member as required.

[8] Having considered the file, I find myself in agreement with the parties that the General Division member erred in the manner alleged. The member should have addressed the Appellant’s argument regarding the alleged drop in hours worked per week.

[9] To be clear, it was (and is) entirely open to the member to find after an examination of the evidence and submissions that the Appellant did not demonstrate just cause to voluntarily leave her employment. But the Appellant’s arguments and evidence must be fully considered in coming to that conclusion.

[10] I agree that a new hearing is required so that the parties can make their respective cases in full.

Conclusion

[11] For the above reasons and on consent, the appeal is allowed. The matter will be returned to the General Division for reconsideration.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.