Employment Insurance (EI)

Decision Information

Decision Content



Decision

[1] The appeal is dismissed. The Appellant’s benefit period cannot be extended beyond June 30, 2018.

Overview

[2] The Appellant worked as an early childhood educator for a school board. She lost her employment due to shortage of work and made a claim for regular employment insurance benefits. A benefit period was established effective July 2, 2017, and she claimed five weeks of regular benefits. After returning to work for approximately two months, the Appellant gave birth to her daughter and made a renewal claim for maternity and parental benefits. She asked to receive 15 weeks of maternity benefits and 35 weeks of parental benefits. The Commission decided that she was entitled to receive 15 weeks of maternity benefits and 14 weeks of parental benefits before her benefit period ended on June 30, 2018.

Issues

Issue 1: Can the Appellant’s benefit period be extended beyond June 30, 2018?

Issue 2: Is the Appellant entitled to receive additional weeks of parental benefits after June 30, 2018?

Analysis

[3] The relevant legislative provisions are reproduced in the Annex to this decision.

Issue 1: Can the Appellant’s benefit period be extended beyond June 30, 2018?

[4] No. The Appellant’s benefit period cannot be extended beyond June 30, 2018, because her benefit period was established effective July 2, 2017, and she received regular benefits during her benefit period.

[5] The length of a benefit period is 52 weeks (subsection 10(2) of the Employment Insurance Act (EI Act)). A benefit period can be extended in certain circumstances (subsections 10(10) to (15) of the EI Act). When claimants receive special benefits, including sickness, maternity and parental benefits, the benefit period may be extended. However, a claimant’s benefit period may not be extended when they receive regular employment insurance benefits during that benefit period (subsection 10(13) of the EI Act).

[6] A claimant’s benefit period may be cancelled if it has ended and no benefits were paid or payable during the period. A claimant may also cancel a portion of a benefit period immediately before the first week for which benefits were paid (subsection 10(6) of the EI Act).

[7] The Appellant submitted that she is willing to pay back the five weeks of regular benefits she received at the start of her benefit period so that she may continue to receive parental benefits after June 30, 2018. She stated that she was not aware that her benefit period would be limited to one year, and that it is unfair for her to lose six months of parental benefits because she received five weeks of regular benefits.

[8] The Commission argued that the Appellant’s benefit period was established on July 2, 2017, and it cannot be extended beyond 52 weeks because she received regular benefits within her benefit period. The maximum number of weeks of benefits payable when regular benefits and special benefits are combined is 50 weeks. The Appellant’s benefit period therefore cannot be extended beyond June 30, 2018. The Commission also argued that the Appellant’s benefit period established on July 2, 2017, could not be cancelled because she had already received benefits under her claim.

[9] I accept the Commission’s uncontested evidence that the Appellant received regular employment insurance benefits during her benefit period established on July 2, 2017. I therefore find that subsection 10(13) of the EI Act does not apply to permit an extension to the Appellant’s benefit period. The Appellant has filed no evidence to suggest that any other provision in subsections 10(10) to (15) of the EI Act would apply to extend her benefit period.

[10] I also find that the Appellant’s benefit period cannot be cancelled under subsection 10(6) of the EI Act because she has already received benefits during her benefit period.

Issue 2: Is the Appellant entitled to receive additional weeks of parental benefits after June 30, 2018?

[11] No. The Appellant is not entitled to receive additional parental benefits after June 30, 2018, since benefits can only be received for weeks that fall within a benefit period.

[12] When an insured person who qualifies for benefits makes an initial claim for benefits, a benefit period is established and, once it is established, benefits are payable to the person “for each week of unemployment that falls in the benefit period” (section 9 of the EI Act).

[13] If a benefit period has been established for a claimant, benefits may be paid to the claimant for each week of unemployment in the benefit period, subject to maximums established by section 12 of the EI Act. The maximum number of weeks of maternity benefits is 15 weeks, and the maximum number of weeks of parental benefits in a benefit period is 35 weeks or 61 weeks, as elected by the claimant (subsection 12(3) of the EI Act).

[14] The Appellant asked to receive 35 weeks of parental benefits. She argued that she needs to receive the full 35 weeks of benefits so that she may care for her daughter for the first year of her life. The Commission submitted that the Appellant is only entitled to 14 weeks of parental benefits because her benefit period ends on June 30, 2018.

[15] I considered whether the Appellant is entitled to receive additional weeks of parental benefits after June 30, 2018. I find that the Appellant is not entitled to receive parental benefits after the end of her benefit period. The Appellant received 15 weeks of maternity benefits and 14 weeks of parental benefits under her renewal claim. I find that she is unfortunately not entitled to receive more than 14 weeks of parental benefits since her benefit period ended on June 30, 2018.

[16] I have sympathy for the Appellant’s situation, but I am required to apply the provisions of the EI Act. Section 10 of the EI Act does not permit an extension of the Appellant’s benefit period beyond June 30, 2018. Sections 9 and 12 of the EI Act clearly state that benefits may only be claimed for weeks that fall within a benefit period.

Conclusion

[17] The appeal is dismissed. The Appellant’s benefit period cannot be extended beyond June 30, 2018.

Heard on:

Method of proceeding:

Appearances:

July 12, 2018

Teleconference

Z. J., Appellant

Annex

The law

Employment Insurance Act

9 When an insured person who qualifies under section 7 or 7.1 makes an initial claim for benefits, a benefit period shall be established and, once it is established, benefits are payable to the person in accordance with this Part for each week of unemployment that falls in the benefit period.

10 (1) A benefit period begins on the later of

  1. (a) the Sunday of the week in which the interruption of earnings occurs, and
  2. (b) the Sunday of the week in which the initial claim for benefits is made.

(2) Except as otherwise provided in subsections (10) to (15) and section 24, the length of a benefit period is 52 weeks.

(3) Subject to a change or cancellation of a benefit period under this section, a benefit period shall not be established for the claimant if a prior benefit period has not ended.

(4) An initial claim for benefits made after the day when the claimant was first qualified to make the claim shall be regarded as having been made on an earlier day if the claimant shows that the claimant qualified to receive benefits on the earlier day and that there was good cause for the delay throughout the period beginning on the earlier day and ending on the day when the initial claim was made.

(5) A claim for benefits, other than an initial claim for benefits, made after the time prescribed for making the claim shall be regarded as having been made on an earlier day if the claimant shows that there was good cause for the delay throughout the period beginning on the earlier day and ending on the day when the claim was made.

(5.1) A claim for benefits referred to in section 23.1 with respect to a family member shall not be regarded as having been made on an earlier day under subsection (4) or (5) if

  1. (a) at the time the claim is made, all benefits that may otherwise have been payable in relation to that claim have already been exhausted;
  2. (b) the beginning of the period referred to in subsection 23.1(4) has already been determined with respect to that family member and the claim would have the effect of moving the beginning of that period to an earlier date; or
  3. (c) the claim is made in any other circumstances set out in the regulations.

(5.2) A claim for benefits referred to in section 23.2 with respect to a critically ill child or children who are critically ill as a result of the same event must not be regarded as having been made on an earlier day under subsection (4) or (5) if

  1. (a) at the time the claim is made, all benefits that may otherwise have been payable in relation to that claim have already been exhausted;
  2. (b) the beginning of the period referred to in subsection 23.2(3) or (4) has already been determined with respect to that child or those children and the claim would have the effect of moving the beginning of that period to an earlier date; or
  3. (c) the claim is made in any other circumstances set out in the regulations.

(6) Once a benefit period has been established for a claimant, the Commission may

  1. (a) cancel the benefit period if it has ended and no benefits were paid or payable during the period; or
  2. (b) whether or not the period has ended, cancel at the request of the claimant that portion of the benefit period immediately before the first week for which benefits were paid or payable, if the claimant
    1. (i) establishes under this Part, as an insured person, a new benefit period beginning the first week for which benefits were paid or payable or establishes, under Part VII.1, as a self-employed person within the meaning of subsection 152.01(1), a new benefit period beginning the first week for which benefits were paid or payable, and
    2. (ii) shows that there was good cause for the delay in making the request throughout the period beginning on the day when benefits were first paid or payable and ending on the day when the request for cancellation was made.

(7) A cancelled benefit period or portion of a benefit period is deemed never to have begun.

(8) A benefit period ends when any of the following first occurs:

  1. (a) no further benefits are payable to the claimant in their benefit period, including for the reason that benefits have been paid for the maximum number of weeks for which benefits may be paid under section 12;
  2. (b) the benefit period would otherwise end under this section; or
  3. (c) [Repealed, 2002, c. 9, s. 12]
  4. (d) the claimant
    1. (i) requests that their benefit period end,
    2. (ii) makes a new initial claim for benefits under this Part or Part VII.1, and
    3. (iii) qualifies, as an insured person, to receive benefits under this Part or qualifies, as a self-employed person within the meaning of subsection 152.01(1), to receive benefits under Part VII.1.

(9) Whether or not the benefit period has ended, a request under paragraph 8(d) shall be regarded as having been made on an earlier day if the claimant shows that there was good cause for the delay throughout the period beginning on the earlier day and ending on the day when the request was made.

(10) A claimant’s benefit period is extended by the aggregate of any weeks during the benefit period for which the claimant proves, in such manner as the Commission may direct, that the claimant was not entitled to benefits because the claimant was

  1. (a) confined in a jail, penitentiary or other similar institution and was not found guilty of the offence for which the claimant was being held or any other offence arising out of the same transaction;
  2. (b) in receipt of earnings paid because of the complete severance of their relationship with their former employer;
  3. (c) in receipt of workers’ compensation payments for an illness or injury; or
  4. (d) in receipt of payments under a provincial law on the basis of having ceased to work because continuing to work would have resulted in danger to the claimant, her unborn child or a child whom she was breast-feeding.

(11) A claimant’s benefit period is extended by the aggregate of any weeks during an extension of a benefit period under subsection (10) for which the claimant proves, in such manner as the Commission may direct, that the claimant was not entitled to benefits because of a reason specified in that subsection.

(12) If the child or children referred to in subsection 23(1) are hospitalized during the period referred to in subsection 23(2), the benefit period is extended by the number of weeks during which the child or children are hospitalized.

(12.1) If, during the period referred to in subsection 23(2), the start date of a claimant’s period of parental leave is deferred or a claimant is directed to return to duty from parental leave, in accordance with regulations made under the National Defence Act, the benefit period is extended by the number of weeks during which the claimant’s parental leave is deferred or the claimant is directed to return to duty, as the case may be.

(13) If, during a claimant’s benefit period,

  1. (a) regular benefits were not paid to the claimant,
  2. (b) benefits were paid to the claimant for more than one of the reasons mentioned in paragraphs 12(3)(a) to (e) and at least one of those benefits was paid for fewer than the applicable maximum number of weeks established for those reasons, and
  3. (c) the maximum total number of weeks established for those reasons is greater than 50, the benefit period is extended so that those benefits may be paid up to that maximum total number of weeks.

(13.1) A claimant’s benefit period that has not ended before July 3, 2016, or that begins on or after that date, is extended by 17 weeks if the number of weeks for which benefits may be paid to the claimant has been increased as a result of subsection 12(2.1).

(13.2) Subject to subsections (13.7) and (14.1), if a claimant’s benefit period ended before July 3, 2016, that benefit period is deemed, despite subsection (8), not to have ended and it is extended by 17 weeks beginning on July 3, 2016 if the number of weeks for which benefits may be paid to the claimant has been increased as a result of subsection 12(2.1).

(13.3) A claimant’s benefit period that has not ended before July 3, 2016, or that begins on or after that date, is extended by 37 weeks if the number of weeks for which benefits may be paid to the claimant has been increased as a result of subsection 12(2.3).

(13.4) Subject to subsections (13.7) and (14.1), if a claimant’s benefit period ended before July 3, 2016, that benefit period is deemed, despite subsection (8), not to have ended and it is extended by 37 weeks beginning on July 3, 2016 if the number of weeks for which benefits may be paid to the claimant has been increased as a result of subsection 12(2.3).

(13.5) A claimant’s benefit period is extended by 29 weeks if the number of weeks for which benefits may be paid to the claimant has been increased as a result of subsection 12(2.5).

(13.6) A claimant’s benefit period is extended by 22 weeks if the number of weeks for which benefits may be paid to the claimant has been increased as a result of subsection 12(2.6).

(13.7) A benefit period that is deemed under subsection (13.2) or (13.4) not to have ended does not include the period that begins on the day after the day on which the benefit period ended and that ends on July 2, 2016.

(14) Subject to subsections (14.1) and (15), an extension under any of subsections (10) to (13.6) must not result in a benefit period of more than 104 weeks.

(14.1) The period that is excluded under subsection (13.7) is to be included in the calculation of the 104 weeks for the purposes of subsection (14).

(15) Unless the benefit period is also extended under any of subsections (10) to (12.1), an extension under subsection (13) must not result in a benefit period of more than the sum of two weeks and the total of the maximum number of weeks established under subsection 12(3) for each of the benefits paid to the claimant for one of the reasons mentioned in paragraphs 12(3)(a) to (e) during the claimant’s benefit period before it was extended under subsection (13).

12 (1) If a benefit period has been established for a claimant, benefits may be paid to the claimant for each week of unemployment that falls in the benefit period, subject to the maximums established by this section.

(2) Subject to subsections (2.1) to (2.6), the maximum number of weeks for which benefits may be paid in a benefit period because of a reason other than those mentioned in subsection (3) shall be determined in accordance with the table in Schedule I by reference to the regional rate of unemployment that applies to the claimant and the number of hours of insurable employment of the claimant in their qualifying period.

(2.1) Subject to subsection (2.7), the number of weeks of benefits set out in the table in Schedule I that applies in respect of a claimant is deemed to be the number of weeks that would otherwise apply in respect of the claimant, but for this subsection, increased by five weeks if the following conditions are met:

  1. (a) the claimant is not a long-tenured worker;
  2. (b) the claimant’s benefit period began during the period beginning on January 4, 2015 and ending on July 8, 2017;
  3. (c) the claimant’s ordinary residence at the beginning of the benefit period was in a region referred to in subsection (2.8); and
  4. (d) benefits were paid or payable to the claimant because of a reason mentioned in subsection (2) for at least one week in the benefit period.

(2.2) If subsection (2.1) applies in respect of a claimant whose benefit period is deemed under subsection 10(13.2) not to have ended,

  1. (a) the claimant may, for weeks beginning on or after July 3, 2016, be paid benefits because of a reason mentioned in subsection (2) for no more than the five additional weeks referred to in subsection (2.1); and
  2. (b) the claimant may not be paid those additional five weeks of benefits for any week that began before July 3, 2016.

(2.3) Subject to subsection (2.7), the number of weeks of benefits set out in the table in Schedule I that applies in respect of a claimant is deemed to be the number of weeks that would otherwise apply in respect of the claimant, but for this subsection, increased by 25 weeks if the following conditions are met:

  1. (a) the claimant is a long-tenured worker;
  2. (b) the claimant’s benefit period began during the period beginning on January 4, 2015 and ending on October 29, 2016;
  3. (c) the claimant’s ordinary residence at the beginning of the benefit period was in a region referred to in subsection (2.8); and
  4. (d) benefits were paid or payable to the claimant because of a reason mentioned in subsection (2) for at least one week in the benefit period.

(2.4) If subsection (2.3) applies in respect of a claimant whose benefit period is deemed under subsection 10(13.4) not to have ended,

  1. (a) the claimant may, for weeks beginning on or after July 3, 2016, be paid benefits because of a reason mentioned in subsection (2) for no more than the 25 additional weeks referred to in subsection (2.3); and
  2. (b) the claimant may not be paid those additional 25 weeks of benefits for any week that began before July 3, 2016.

(2.5) The number of weeks of benefits set out in the table in Schedule I that applies in respect of a claimant is deemed to be the number of weeks that would otherwise apply in respect of the claimant, but for this subsection, increased by 17 weeks if the following conditions are met:

  1. (a) the claimant is a long-tenured worker;
  2. (b) the claimant’s benefit period began during the period beginning on October 30, 2016 and ending on February 25, 2017;
  3. (c) the claimant’s ordinary residence at the beginning of the benefit period was in a region referred to in subsection (2.8); and
  4. (d) benefits were paid or payable to the claimant because of a reason mentioned in subsection (2) for at least one week in the benefit period.

(2.6) The number of weeks of benefits set out in the table in Schedule I that applies in respect of a claimant is deemed to be the number of weeks that would otherwise apply in respect of the claimant, but for this subsection, increased by 10 weeks if the following conditions are met:

  1. (a) the claimant is a long-tenured worker;
  2. (b) the claimant’s benefit period began during the period beginning on February 26, 2017 and ending on July 8, 2017;
  3. (c) the claimant’s ordinary residence at the beginning of the benefit period was in a region referred to in subsection (2.8); and
  4. (d) benefits were paid or payable to the claimant because of a reason mentioned in subsection (2) for at least one week in the benefit period.

(2.7) If more than one benefit period in respect of a claimant began before July 3, 2016, subsection (2.1) or (2.3), as the case may be, applies to increase the number of weeks of benefits only in the benefit period that began on the day that is closest to that day.

(2.8) The regions, for the purposes of subsections (2.1) to (2.6), are the following regions described in Schedule I to the Employment Insurance Regulations:

  1. (a) the region of Northern Ontario described in subsection 2(3) of that Schedule;
  2. (b) the region of Sudbury described in subsection 2(14) of that Schedule;
  3. (c) the region of Northern Manitoba described in subsection 6(3) of that Schedule;
  4. (c.1) the region of Southern Interior British Columbia described in subsection 7(1) of that Schedule;
  5. (d) the region of Northern British Columbia described in subsection 7(5) of that Schedule;
  6. (e) the region of Saskatoon described in subsection 9(2) of that Schedule;
  7. (e.1) the region of Southern Saskatchewan described in subsection 9(3) of that Schedule;
  8. (f) the region of Northern Saskatchewan described in subsection 9(4) of that Schedule;
  9. (g) the region of Calgary described in subsection 10(1) of that Schedule;
  10. (g.1) the region of Edmonton described in subsection 10(2) of that Schedule;
  11. (h) the region of Southern Alberta described in subsection 10(3) of that Schedule;
  12. (i) the region of Northern Alberta described in subsection 10(4) of that Schedule;
  13. (j) the region of Newfoundland/Labrador described in subsection 11(2) of that Schedule;
  14. (k) the region of Whitehorse described in subsection 12(1) of that Schedule; and
  15. (l) the region of Nunavut described in subsection 14(2) of that Schedule.

(3) The maximum number of weeks for which benefits may be paid in a benefit period

  1. (a) because of pregnancy is 15;
  2. (b) because the claimant is caring for one or more new-born children of the claimant or one or more children placed with the claimant for the purpose of adoption is 35;
  3. (c) because of a prescribed illness, injury or quarantine is 15;
  4. (d) because the claimant is providing care or support to one or more family members described in subsection 23.1(2) is 26; and
  5. (e) because the claimant is providing care or support to one or more critically ill children described in subsection 23.2(1), is 35.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.