Employment Insurance (EI)

Decision Information

Decision Content

Citation: FF v Canada Employment Insurance Commission, 2020 SST 1027

Tribunal File Number: GE-20-1924

BETWEEN:

F. F.

Appellant/Claimant

and

Canada Employment Insurance Commission

Respondent


SOCIAL SECURITY TRIBUNAL DECISION
General Division – Employment Insurance Section


DECISION BY: Catherine Shaw
HEARD ON: September 30, 2020
DATE OF DECISION: October 5, 2020

On this page

Decision

[1] The appeal is dismissed. The Claimant has not shown that she has worked enough hoursFootnote 1 to qualify for employment insurance (EI) maternity and parental benefits. 

Overview

[2] The Claimant applied for EI maternity and parental benefits, but the Canada Employment Insurance Commission (the Commission) decided that the Claimant had not worked enough hours to qualify.

[3] The Commission says that the Claimant does not have enough hours because she needs 600 hours, but only has 510. The Claimant says that she would have worked enough hours if not for the COVID-19 public health emergency. She asks the Tribunal to consider her unique circumstances and allow her to access her maternity benefits to support her family in this difficult situation.

Issue

[4] Has the Claimant worked enough hours to qualify for EI maternity and parental benefits?

Analysis

[5] Not everyone who stops working can be paid EI benefits. Claimants have to proveFootnote 2 that they qualify for benefits.Footnote 3 In order to qualify, claimants need to have worked enough hours during a certain timeframe.Footnote 4 (This timeframe is called the qualifying period; I will explain what that is in more detail further down in the decision.) 

[6] In general, the number of hours that claimants need to have worked in order to qualify depends on the regional rate of unemployment that applies to that claimant.Footnote 5 But, claimants who want maternity or parental benefits must have 600 or more hours to qualify to get them.Footnote 6

[7] As noted above, the hours that are counted are the ones that the Claimant worked during her qualifying period. In general, the qualifying period is the 52 weeks before a claimant’s benefit period would start.Footnote 7 (The benefit period is a different timeframe; it is the time when EI benefits may be paid to claimants.) 

[8] The Commission decided that the Claimant’s qualifying period was the usual 52-weeks and went from July 21, 2019 to July 18, 2020.

[9] The Employment Insurance Act was recently changed to facilitate access to EI benefits for those transitioning from the EI Emergency Response Benefit (EI ERB) or Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB). The law now says that a claimant who wants to receive maternity and parental benefits, who has been paid EI ERB or CERB during their qualifying period, receives a qualifying period extension.Footnote 8 In the Claimant’s case, her qualifying period is extended by 24 weeks.Footnote 9

[10] With the extension, I find the Claimant’s qualifying period is from February 3, 2019 to July 18, 2020.

[11] The Claimant testified that she was previously on maternity leave before she returned to work in March 2020. She went on maternity leave in September 2018 and returned to work on March 10, 2020. She was employed from March 10 to March 13, 2020, when she was suddenly laid off due to COVID-19. The employer issued a record of employment (ROE) dated March 23, 2020, which states the Claimant had worked 30 hours.

[12] The Claimant confirmed at the hearing that her work in March 2020 was her only employment since September 2018. She agreed with the hours stated on her ROE and said she had no further hours in her qualifying period.

[13] As part of the temporary measures to facilitate access to benefits, the law now says that claimants who meet certain criteriaFootnote 10 and who have less than 600 hours in their qualifying period are deemed to have accumulated an additional 480 hours.Footnote 11 This allows claimants to qualify for maternity and parental benefits with a minimum of 120 hours of work.

[14] While these changes to the Employment Insurance Act apply to the Claimant, even with the additional 480 hours she does not have enough hours in her qualifying period to receive maternity and parental benefits.

[15] I find that the Claimant has not proven that she has enough hours to qualify for benefits, because she needs 600 hours, but has 510 hours.Footnote 12

[16] I recognize that the Claimant’s work ended abruptly due to the COVID-19 pandemic. She has consistently stated to the Commission and the Tribunal that she would have been able to work enough hours to qualify for maternity benefits if not for the impact of COVID-19. The Claimant understands that she does not meet the minimum required hours to qualify for benefits but asks that she be allowed to receive her maternity benefits because of the unique circumstances of her case.

[17] Unfortunately, the law does not allow for any payment of maternity benefits unless a claimant has qualified to receive them. In this case, the Claimant does not meet the hours requirement, so does not qualify for benefits. I truly sympathize with the Claimant’s situation, but I am unable to circumvent, rewrite or ignore the law, even in the interest of compassion.Footnote 13

Conclusion

[18] The appeal is dismissed.

 

Heard on:

September 30, 2020

Method of proceeding:

Teleconference

Appearances:

F. F., Appellant

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.