Employment Insurance (EI)

Decision Information

Decision Content

Citation: DB v Canada Employment Insurance Commission, 2022 SST 134

Social Security Tribunal of Canada
General Division – Employment Insurance Section

Decision

Appellant: D. B.
Respondent: Canada Employment Insurance Commission

Decision under appeal: Canada Employment Insurance Commission reconsideration decision (420769) dated April 20, 2021 (issued by Service Canada)

Tribunal member: Solange Losier
Type of hearing: Videoconference
Hearing date: February 16, 2022
Hearing participant: Appellant
Decision date: February 21, 2022
File number: GE-21-700

On this page

Decision

[1] The appeal is dismissed. The Claimant cannot receive parental benefits after April 10, 2021 because it is more than 52 weeks after his child’s birth.

Overview

[2] The Claimant’s son was born on X and he applied for parental benefits a few months later, on December 2, 2020.Footnote 1 In his application for benefits, he picked the “standard” benefit option and asked for 35 weeks of parental benefits.Footnote 2 However, the Claimant only received 20 of the 35 weeks he asked for because the parental benefit payment window ended.Footnote 3

[3] The Claimant asked the Commission to extend the parental benefit window so that he could collect the remaining 15 weeks of parental benefits.Footnote 4 The Commission decided that it was not possible because the 52 week parental benefit window started when his child was born.Footnote 5

[4] The Claimant argues that an exception should be made in his case. His child was born abroad and he was unable to see his child during the pandemic because flights out of the country were paused.Footnote 6 He submits that he made multiple calls to Service Canada and was told not to apply until he was united with his child.

Matter I have to consider first

Charter case

[5] This case was previously scheduled for a regular hearing.Footnote 7 It was adjourned on that date due to technical difficulties and because the Claimant wanted to make an appeal based on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter). A pre-hearing conference was scheduled to discuss the dates for submitting the Charter argument notice form.Footnote 8

[6] The Claimant complied by submitting the Charter argument notice form.Footnote 9 The Commission provided their submissions in response.Footnote 10 I decided that the Claimant’s appeal did not raise a Charter issue and provided my reasons in an interlocutory decision.Footnote 11 The hearing was then scheduled for a regular hearing.Footnote 12

Issue

[7] Can the parental benefit window be extended?

Analysis

[8] The EI parental benefits program offers financial support for parents who are not working while they care for their newborn or newly adopted child. A Claimant can pick either the standard or extended parental benefit option. Depending on which option is picked, the Claimant can also pick the number of weeks they want to collect, up-to a maximum amount.

[9] There are some differences depending on which parental benefit option is picked by a claimant. For example, the maximum number of weeks for the standard option is 35-weeks and the extended parental benefit option is 61-weeks.Footnote 13

[10] Also, parental benefits under the standard option are paid at a rate of 55% of the weekly insurable earnings up to a maximum amount.Footnote 14 Under the extended option, parental benefits are paid at a rate of 33% of the weekly insurable earnings up to a maximum amount.Footnote 15

[11] The parental benefit window is different depending on whether the standard or extended option is picked. If a Claimant picks the standard option, then the parental benefit window is 52 weeks from the date of the child’s birth.Footnote 16 If a Claimant picks the extended option, then the parental benefit window is 78 weeks from the date of the child’s birth.Footnote 17

[12] There are some exceptions that would extend the parental benefit window beyond the 52 week period. For example, if a child or children are hospitalized, or if a Claimant is part of the Canadian forces and their parental leave is deferred or they are directed to return to duty from parental leave, then the period can be extended.Footnote 18

[13] Once a claimant picks either standard or extended parental benefit option it cannot be changed once parental benefits have been paid under either option.Footnote 19

Agreed facts

[14] The parties agree to the following:

  1. The Claimant’s child was born on X
  2. The Claimant applied for parental benefits on December 2, 2020
  3. The Claimant requested 35 weeks of parental benefits under the standard option
  4. The benefit period was made retroactively effective on November 15, 2020
  5. The Claimant was paid 20 weeks of parental benefits

The parental benefit window cannot be extended

[15] I find that the Claimant’s parental benefit window period was correctly decided by the Commission. The child’s date of birth was X, so the parental benefit window is 52 weeks starting from April 5, 2020 to April 10, 2021.

[16] I find that none of the exceptions in law apply in this case, specifically his child was not hospitalized and he was not in the Canadian Forces.Footnote 20 This is not disputed between the parties. This means that the benefit period cannot be extended.

[17] I accept that the Claimant did make ongoing efforts to contact the Commission to ask about the parental benefit program. The Commission told him that he could not apply until he was united with his child. He applied once he was able to make arrangements for medical insurance, to be off from work and to fly abroad to be with his child.

[18] The Claimant has presented compassionate circumstances. He could not be reunited with his child who was born abroad. It is clear that it was not his fault that flights were paused during the pandemic. I acknowledge the hardship this caused for him and his family.

[19] The Claimant noted that there were other legislative changes during the pandemic that allowed for laws to be applied flexibly, however I note there were no legislative changes to the applicable sections in this case. The law as stated does not give my any discretion, flexibility or authority to extend the 52 week parental benefit window, even in unique or unusual circumstances.

Conclusion

[20] The appeal is dismissed. This means that the Claimant cannot collect parental benefits after the parental benefit window period ended.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.