Old Age Security (OAS) and Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS)

Decision Information

Decision Content

Citation: SC v Minister of Employment and Social Development (formerly Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development) and SP v Minister of Employment and Social Development (formerly Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development), 2021 SST 682

Tribunal File Number: GP-20-877 and GP-20-870

BETWEEN:

S.C.

Appellant

and

Minister of Employment and Social Development
(formerly Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development)

Respondent

and

S.P.

Appellant

and

Minister of Employment and Social Development
(formerly Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development)

Respondent


Social Security Tribunal Decision
General Division – Income Security Section


DECISION BY: Antoinette Cardillo
Date of Decision: September 9, 2021
CORRIGENDUM DATE: September 22, 2021

On this page

Reasons and decision

[1] The parties to this appeal have requested that the Member make a decision pursuant to Section 18 of the Social Security Tribunal Regulations based on the agreement dated September 8, 2021.

[2] The agreement says:

The Appellant (S. C.) resided in Canada from the date he landed in Canada on August 15, 1988 until December 28, 1994, and from April 14, 2010 to June 16, 2021. Therefore, pursuant to section 3(2) of the Old Age Security Act, he is entitled to a partial pension of 10/40th from December 2013 onwards. He is also entitled to receive the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) pursuant to section 11 of the Old Age Security Act effective December 2013 onwards.

Based on the fact that the Appellant (S. C.) is eligible for the Old Age Security pension and the GIS effective December 2013, S. P. (the Appellant’s spouse) is entitled to the Allowance benefit amounts she received from July 2014 to April 2017.

As a result, the Appellant (S. C.) was overpaid the OAS partial pension and GIS amounts he received for the period of July 2011 to November 2013. The overpayment amount is $37, 039.59.

[3] The appeal is allowed in accordance with the agreement.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.